I like the Empire Builder series of crayon railroad games. Something about their freeform nature — where you start with a blank slate and slowly fill in that canvas — appeals to my right brain and makes me think that I’m really creating something. Beyond that the games have a neat puzzle-like feel to them, where at any time you’re juggling a set of three demand cards, each with three demands, and trying to figure out how to best and most efficiently serve them. Creativity & puzzles together define some of my favorite game design elements.
As a result the Empire Builder series of games is, perhaps, the only games that I played in college that I still play today. Dune, Dragon Pass, Hacker, and others now largely gather dust, but I play a couple of tabletop games of Empire Builder (or one of the variants) every year, and I play the Iron Dragon computer game with much more frequency than that (albeit with frequent swearing at the slow and dumb AI).
Unfortunately Empire Builder is dated. The original game was released in 1980 and though there have been a lot of neat new maps, events, and terrain types since then there have been very few changes to the basic game. As a result, the game is too long and doesn’t make good enough use of its components. It’s also too solitaire and it’s got some rough corners that any modern developer would probably smooth right out. Unfortunately, Mayfair doesn’t seem too inclined to change the game. And who can blame them? Based on the continual flow of Empire Builder variants I have to imagine that the games remain good sellers, and that’s something that you don’t mess with.
But they should. The games are enjoyable enough that they deserve an even wider audience than they have right now. So, in this column and an upcoming one I’m going to put my money where my mouth is and offer up how I’d redesign Empire Builder if I had the chance.
I’m working on the assumption that any new version of the game would have to keep the base ideals of the original game: building track by drawing on a board with crayons, then moving goods along those tracks in trains in order to meet randomly drawn demand cards. However, even with those tight constraints I think there’s a lot of room for change and improvement.
Redesigning the Cards
In recent years Mayfair has slowly been rereleasing their Empire Builder games, and as they have they’ve been producing nicer looking boards, boxes with prettier covers, and even some new money. What they’ve largely missed, however, is a redesign of the demand cards.
Demand cards tell you what to do in Empire Builder. Each one lists three different cities, each of which wants a different good. You pick one of those goods to deliver to one of those cities and then you receive a payout.
This might have all worked somewhat well in the original Empire Builder, which was set in the United States, but as the series expanded to different locations it started centering games on maps that people were less familiar with. As a result you now have to constantly look up where each item is available at and then where both those source cities and the destination cities are located on the map. Mayfair tries to make this easy by including reference charts listing where everything is, but there’s always a lot of looking up of locations whenever you get a new demand card.
If there’s one thing that The Settlers of Catan taught us, it’s that things don’t have to be this way. You can incorporate a lot of game information on the cards and other components that you include in a game. And, I think this is the place to really start redesigning Empire Builder.
 |
 |
| Original Design | Simple Variant |
Nearby I’ve mocked up a card from Australian Rails (left) and then I’ve offered a simple variant (right) of it, which simply lists the map grid location of the destination city. With a day or two’s work you could probably revamp all the existing cards without changing their layout, and you’d end up with a game that had, perhaps, 20% more usability.
Of course this is in no way the be-all or end-all. Better would be to list all the places where your goods could come from as well. So I tried this out in the new card design that you can see nearby (below left). It indeed has all of the information: where a good comes from as well as the grid locations for both those sources and the destinations.
 |
 |
| Ugly Redesign | Nicer Redesign |
I have no doubt that this card does the job. However, it also loses a lot of the simple elegance of the original design, and there’s no good focus on the two most important factors: goods and destination. Instead everything mashes together into a singular whole.
This card design stuff can be tough.
I’m happier with my second try at the same (above right), which I think makes the information easier to quickly assess. I’m sure it could be better, but I’m putting together a quick sample rather than actually doing a graphic design. The main point is that all the information is in one place, so that you don’t have to flip through a booklet or memorize a bunch of information. I think Settlers has really shown the usefulness of this type of design.
Another thing that Settlers taught us, which I wasn’t able to mock up here, is the value of graphical information in place of simple text. In my ideal card design for Empire Builder each demand would be graphically depicted via a map. You’d see the overall area covered by the game, with source cities marked in red and the destination city marked in green. Maybe there’d even be lines between these points listing the minimal costs for getting from one place to the other, to make it easier for you to assess which source you wanted to go to.
The problem with this final possibility is that the teeny little cards, with three demands each, can’t really accomodate it. You’d either need larger cards or, more rationally, you’d need to put a single demand on a card rather than three, and that delves further into upsetting the base design of Empire Builder than I want to this week.
Conclusion
If I’ve offered one insight into game design this week, I hope it’s that graphic design is very important. I’m fairly convinced that The Settlers of Catan has succeeded as one of the best-selling Games of Ours not just because of its gameplay, but also because of its very good and utilitarian graphic design sense. Empire Builder shows how non-utilitarian component design often was, just one gaming generation before Catan, but also how there’s simple room for improvement.
In my next article in this series, I’m going to finish up my survey of Empire Builder by talking about some of its game design that could be overhauled to create a richer, and generally improved, twenty-first century game.
Author’s Note: A few years after I wrote this article, Mayfair redesigned their cards. Unfortunately, they were largely the same, except the desired good was printed in color, which made it slightly easier to match the good on the card to the board and to the token in the tray … but not a lot. However, 2012 may finally see the revamp I envisioned with the release of Empire Express. I’m going to talk about that in a third article in this series, sometime soon.
In the meantime, if you want to read the second article in this series, you can jump straight to Part Two, where I talk about mechanics. —SA, 12/23/10, 6/30/12
